Evaluasi Penerimaan dan Usability Aplikasi SIBERGO Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model dan SUS

Authors

  • Layli Hardiyanti UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Kahfi Gunardi UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Ardi Susanto UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Muhammad Iszul Wilsa UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Sokid UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59061/jentik.v4i2.1539

Keywords:

SIBERGO, Usability, System Usability Scale, Technology Acceptance Model, PLS-SEM

Abstract

As a mobile academic information system, SIBERGO supports students in carrying out their daily campus routines. To find out both how usable the application is and how willing students are to adopt it, this study combines two complementary instruments — the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Responses were gathered from 257 student users through an online questionnaire, then processed via descriptive statistics, validity and reliability checks, Pearson correlation, and Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). On the 0-100 SUS scale, the application averaged 57.97, a Marginal, D-grade result that points to usability still below what the industry generally considers acceptable. Under TAM, five of the six proposed paths were statistically significant (p<0.05); notably, Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) drove both Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Attitude Toward Using (ATU) at coefficients of 0.598 and 0.455. The direct PU-to-Behavioral Intention (BI) path, by contrast, was not significant (coefficient 0.068; p=0.357), leaving ATU to act as a full mediator between the two. A subsequent correlation analysis found PEOU to be the construct most closely tied to SUS scores (r=0.589; p<0.001), reinforcing agreement between the two evaluation methods. In short, students find SIBERGO reasonably straightforward to learn, yet its broader usability — system stability and feature consistency above all — has room to improve before daily use can be considered optimal.

References

Afiana, F. N., Rifai, Z., & Frilisia, W. A. (2024). Integrasi Technology Readiness dan Technology Acceptance Model terhadap kesiapan pengguna Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) pada industri pengolahan kelapa organik. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 14(2), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol14iss2pp100-110

Alam, R. G. G., & Kurniasih, P. R. (2024). Use of the System Usability Scale (SUS) method in the SIMAMURAT application. Journal Scientific and Applied Informatics, 7(2), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.36085/jsai.v7i2.6209

Andriyani, R., & Sari, A. O. (2023). Penerapan metode System Usability Scale untuk evaluasi sistem informasi e-procurement. JoMMiT: Jurnal Multi Media dan IT, 7(2), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.46961/jommit.v7i2.902

Anrahvi, R., Pratama, N., & Stevani, S. (2024). Penerapan metode System Usability Scale (SUS) dalam mengukur kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap website direktori akademik. Indonesian Journal of Business Economics and Management, 3(2), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.57152/ijbem.v3i2.2020

Ariwanta, I. P. Y. A., Gunawan, I. M. A. O., & Indrawan, G. (2024). Evaluasi user experience Sistem Informasi Akademik pada website mahasiswa.pkkb.ac.id menggunakan User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Journal of Information System Research, 5(2), 363-373.

Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.

Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114-123.

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189-194). Taylor & Francis.

Dako, R. D. R., & Ridwan, W. (2022). Pengukuran usability terhadap aplikasi Tesadaptif.Net dengan System Usability Scale. Jambura Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 4(2), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.37905/jjeee.v4i2.14626

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Fitriastuti, F., Putri, A. E., Sunardi, A. K., & Hidayat, R. A. (2024). Analisis website SIAKAD Universitas Janabadra menggunakan metode UAT. Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 5(1), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.35957/jtsi.v5i1.6998

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.

Imron Zamzani, M., Anggi Leksono, V., Afrizal, F., & Jamil, A. (2022). Evaluasi layanan akademik di Universitas X dengan pendekatan metode Kano. SITEKIN: Jurnal Sains, Teknologi dan Industri, 20(1), 308-313.

Kacung. (2024). Analisa System Usability Scale (SUS) terhadap aplikasi sistem informasi kegiatan kampus berbasis Android. SPIRIT, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.53567/spirit.v16i2.368

Kurniawan, S. S., Maharani, N. Z., Sensuse, D., & Purwaningsih, E. H. (2025). Applying user-centered design and System Usability Scale to design knowledge management system for exam proctors in higher education. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 11(4), 1043-1056. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v11i4.9919

Marhaeni, & Atmadja, K. (2025). Analisis penerimaan Sistem Informasi Akademik Kampus ISTN dengan pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Jayakarta, 5(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.52362/jmijayakarta.v5i1.1747

Maulana, M. R., Rahaningsih, N., & Pratama, D. (2023). Analisis usability aplikasi Point of Sales (POS) berbasis web menggunakan metode System Usability Scale. Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika, 7(1), 387-394. https://doi.org/10.36040/jati.v7i1.6100

Melyani, L., Setiawan, D., & Utamo, P. E. P. (2023). Evaluasi usability Sistem Informasi Karir dan Tracer Study Universitas Jambi menggunakan metode System Usability Scale (SUS) dan Heuristic Evaluation (HE). Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi, 11(3), 473-479. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v11i3.65233

Mulyani, A., Nashrulloh, M. R., & Karlina, A. (2022). Analisis penerimaan Sistem Informasi Akademik Mahasiswa (SIAM) Institut Teknologi Garut menggunakan metode Technology Acceptance Model. Jurnal Algoritma, 19(2), 810-816. https://doi.org/10.33364/algoritma/v.19-2.1198

Polgan, J. M., Asrori, Y. R., & Wahono, B. B. (2024). Analisis kegunaan aplikasi sistem akademik mahasiswa Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara berdasarkan metode System Usability Scale. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 13, 1353-1361.

Rihadatul 'Aisy, Mursityo, Y. T., & Wijoyo, S. H. (2024). Evaluasi usability aplikasi mobile Sampingan menggunakan metode Usability Testing dan System Usability Scale (SUS). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 11(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.20241116613

Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.

Sipayung, E. M., & Susilo, W. S. (2022). Analisis usability portal akademik berbasis web menggunakan USE Questionnaire. Jurnal Telematika, 16(2), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.61769/telematika.v16i2.423

Veni Manik, Primasari, H. C., Wibisono, Y. P., & Irianto, A. B. P. (2021). Evaluasi usability pada aplikasi mobile ACC.ONE menggunakan System Usability Scale (SUS) dan usability testing. Jurnal Sains dan Informatika, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.34128/jsi.v7i1.286

Widayanti, R., & Maknunah, J. (2021). Analisis website STIMATA menggunakan System Usability Scale (SUS). Jurnal Ilmiah Komputasi, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.32409/jikstik.20.3.2776

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Hardiyanti, L., Gunardi, K., Susanto, A., Wilsa, M. I., & Sokid. (2026). Evaluasi Penerimaan dan Usability Aplikasi SIBERGO Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model dan SUS . Jurnal Elektronika Dan Teknik Informatika Terapan ( JENTIK ), 4(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.59061/jentik.v4i2.1539

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.