A Comparative Study of Speech Acts in EFL Textbook Life Today and Train of Thoughts For Student Grade XII of Curriculum Merdeka

Authors

  • Maguna Eliastuti Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
  • Tri Astuti Universitas Tama Jagakarsa
  • Roro Meifi Pitaloka Darma Persada University
  • Vici Febriana Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59061/abdimasterapan.v2i1.715

Keywords:

EFL Textbook, Dialogues, Speech-Act, Classification, Compare

Abstract

Since it turns out the textbook's value as the primary focus of the curriculum, particularly in EFL environments cannot be understated. According to recent studies, even the most-latest textbooks provide insufficient amounts of pragmatic material to help learners enhance their pragmatic competence. Much more research regarding the extent and level of speaking acts must be conducted before future textbooks, specifically for EFL purposes. They are must able to deliver reliable and suitable examples of pragmatic information. Train for Thoughts and Life Today EFL Textbook are not yet comparable. To establish which of the two has more varieties of speech act categories, as well as the percentage and content of each. The study analyzes dialogue speech acts in two Indonesian EFL textbooks created by Kemendikbud and based on the Merdeka Curriculum. In this study, the descriptive qualitative method is applied.  To examine each chapter of the dialogue section, the researcher implemented a table of checklists from Searle's (1979) Speech-Act Classification. Then, multiply the total number of speech acts categorised in each chapter by the percentage of the EFL Textbook. The two results were then compared.

References

Bakhtiarvand, Morteza & Vaezi, Rahim & Tabatabai, Sousabeh. (2014). A Comparative Study of Speech-acts in the Textbooks by Native and Non-native Speakers: A Pragmatic Analysis of New Interchange Series vs. Locally-made EFL Textbooks. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 4. 167-180. 10.4304/tpls.4.1.167-180.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heineman.

Nunan, D. (2009) Second Language Teaching and Learning. Cengage Learning Asia, Pte. Ltd., Vancouver.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Moradi, Afshin., Karbalaei, Alireza., Afraz Shahram. (2013). A Textbook Evaluation of Speech Acts and Language Functions in High School English Textbooks (I, II And III) and Interchange Series, Books I, II, And III. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 323-335.

Pilleux, M. (1969). The Dialogue: A Useful Tool in Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 3(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585829

McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching Materials and the Role of EFL/ESL Teachers: Practice and Theory. London: Bloomsbury.

Roohani, A., & Alipour, J. (2017). An Investigation into The Use of Speech Acts and Language Functions in Iranian High School English Textbooks. International Journal of Research, 6(3), 25-33.

Refualu, N. S., Luardini, M. A., & Norahmi, M. (2021). An Analysis of Speech Act Used in the Written Conversations From English Textbook for Junior High School Grade IX Published by the Ministry of Education and Culture in 2018. Academic Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 22-26.

Searle, R. J. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sukmayanthi, N. M. I. (2021). AN ANALYSIS OF SPEECH ACTS IN THE STUDENT’S TEXTBOOK AT THE SENIOR VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha). International Journal of Language and Literature, 2(5), 72-78.

Fitriani, F., Hidayat, D. N., Husna, N., & Alek, A. (2023). Speech Acts in Text Dialogues: An Analysis of English Textbook Merdeka Belajar for Junior High School. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 16(1), 158-174.

Aida, S. N., Basya, D., & Mahbub, M. A. (2022). Speech Acts in EFL Textbook: A Pragmatic Analysis. Linguapedia, 6(2), 26-33.

Harahap, Y. O., & Rozimela, Y. (2021, November). An Analysis of Students’ Speaking Ability in Speech at the English Department of UMN Al-Washliyah Medan. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2021) (pp. 1-6). Atlantis Press.

Tutuarima, Z., Nuraeningsih, N., & Rusiana, R. (2018). An Analysis of Speech Act Used in London Has Fallen movie. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 7(2), 122.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Maguna Eliastuti, Tri Astuti, Roro Meifi Pitaloka, & Vici Febriana. (2024). A Comparative Study of Speech Acts in EFL Textbook Life Today and Train of Thoughts For Student Grade XII of Curriculum Merdeka. ABDIMAS TERAPAN : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Terapan, 2(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.59061/abdimasterapan.v2i1.715